Description

This track shows multiple alignments of 11 primate assemblies on this target/reference assembly (pygmy chimpanzee - 2024-01-08 - National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health).

The multiple alignments were generated using multiz and other tools in the UCSC/Penn State Bioinformatics comparative genomics alignment pipeline.

count alignment
percent
assembly and
browser link
maf file
type
common name/assembly date
assembly submitter
01 89.082 GCA_028858775.2 syntenic net chimpanzee/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
02 88.572 hg38 syntenic net Human/hg38/Dec. 2013 (GRCh38/hg38)/GRCh38 Genome Reference Consortium Human Reference 38 (GCA_000001405.15)
03 88.326 hs1 syntenic net Human/hs1/Jan. 2022 (T2T CHM13v2.0/hs1)/Telomere to telomere (T2T) assembly of haploid CHM13 + chrY (GCA_009914755.4)
04 87.136 GCA_029281585.2 syntenic net western lowland gorilla/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
05 85.986 GCA_028885655.2 syntenic net Sumatran orangutan/2024-01-05/NHGRI/NIH
06 85.961 GCA_028885625.2 syntenic net Bornean orangutan/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
07 81.986 GCA_028878055.2 syntenic net siamang/2024-01-05/NHGRI/NIH
08 65.027 GCF_011100555.1 maf net white-tufted-ear marmoset/2021-04-28/VGP
09 30.829 GCF_020740605.2 maf net Ring-tailed lemur/2021-11-04/VGP
10 14.512 GCF_027406575.1 maf net slow loris/2022-12-28/VGP

Alignments identity

showing percent identity, how much of the target is matched by the query
chainssyntenicreciprocal
best
lift
over
common
name
assembly
89.08288.89087.89489.067chimpanzeeGCA_028858775.2
88.57287.82585.33888.499Humanhg38
88.32687.72385.55188.283Humanhs1
87.13686.58984.82187.108western lowland gorillaGCA_029281585.2
85.98685.07082.23685.926Sumatran orangutanGCA_028885655.2
85.96185.00482.22585.902Bornean orangutanGCA_028885625.2
81.98680.85377.79681.914siamangGCA_028878055.2
65.02763.74961.76564.946white-tufted-ear marmosetGCF_011100555.1
30.82930.02029.46030.795Ring-tailed lemurGCF_020740605.2
14.51213.58713.84314.488slow lorisGCF_027406575.1

Display Conventions and Configuration

In full and pack display modes, conservation scores are displayed as a wiggle track (histogram) in which the height reflects the size of the score. The conservation wiggles can be configured in a variety of ways to highlight different aspects of the displayed information. Click the Graph configuration help link for an explanation of the configuration options.

Methods

Pairwise alignments of each species to the pygmy chimpanzee//hive/data/genomes/asmHubs/genbankBuild/GCA/029/289/425/GCA_029289425.2_NHGRI_mPanPan1-v2.0_pri/html/GCA_029289425.2_NHGRI_mPanPan1-v2.0_pri.names.tab/GCA_029289425.2/2024-01-08 genome are displayed below the conservation histogram as a grayscale density plot (in pack mode) or as a wiggle (in full mode) that indicates alignment quality. In dense display mode, conservation is shown in grayscale using darker values to indicate higher levels of overall conservation as scored by phastCons.

Checkboxes on the track configuration page allow selection of the species to include in the pairwise display. Note that excluding species from the pairwise display does not alter the the conservation score display.

To view detailed information about the alignments at a specific position, zoom the display in to 30,000 or fewer bases, then click on the alignment.

Credits

This track was created using the following programs:

References

Harris RS. Improved pairwise alignment of genomic DNA. Ph.D. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University, USA. 2007.

PhyloP:

Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program., Green ED, Batzoglou S, Sidow A. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res. 2005 Jul;15(7):901-13. PMID: 15965027; PMC: PMC1172034; DOI: 10.1101/gr.3577405

Pollard KS, Hubisz MJ, Rosenbloom KR, Siepel A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):110-21. PMID: 19858363; PMC: PMC2798823

Siepel A, Haussler D. Phylogenetic Hidden Markov Models. In: Nielsen R, editor. Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 325-351. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-27733-1_12

Siepel A, Pollard KS, and Haussler D. New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2006), pp. 190-205. DOI: 10.1007/11732990_17